Note : I wrote this post for last wednesday, but pulling it over and wrote another one on earthquake and tsunami on Samoa and Indonesia. And now, here it is...
Apparently, this is because this guy likes to put in some objects into his wife private parts as part of their sex life.
Only that the wife are not so keen on it. Wait, that is an understatement. The wife lodged a police report over it.
So this state level minister said that bloke should get some help with his brain to treat his "sexual disorder" before he "targets innocents".
P-p-please-lar.....what so bad about fetish?
Granted, he should not force his wife to do it.
Granted, any sexual act, including one of fetish, should be consensual.
And this guy ABSOLUTELY is at fault for forcing her wife to do it (if the wife is to be believed).
But hey, there is no need for psychiatric help, no?
Having fetish is just like having some preference over some sexual position. Some like it doggie. Some like it cowgirl aka woman on top.
For fetishes, some like to lick toes, some take extreme liking to breast (like me), some like sexy lingerie, some like leather wear, and some, well, like to put something into pussy.
And some may like bondage and SM.
And who can be so noble to claim that all these are wrong?
Should we only have missionary style sex with the consent of God (maybe asking the priest or imam or monk first before fucking)?
No, just like this is a sexological blog, no one should be telling another what they should or should not do behind closed doors.
And what's about that accusation about this pussy-stuffing-loving-guy will target innocents? Why accuse him of a despicable act?
Just because the wife does not like it doesn't change him into a predator. There might be other women who like it and there can be consensual sex, with some fetishes.
Wake up, Malaysia, wake up, World.
